Seems there is a little bit of an issue growing in the Manosphere. Apparently the Pick Up Artist (PUA) camp is having a disagreement with the Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) and the Men’s Right’s Agitators (MRA) groups. So now MRA’s and MGTOW’s who want nothing to do with women whatsoever are labeled ‘losers’ and PUA’s are labeled ‘pussy beggars’.
Feel free to ignore my opinion, as my position in the Manosphere would be seen as highly suspect. Yes, I’m a married man raising another man’s children so that would call into question my sanity, however, I have only one question to both camps as they hurl insults to each other.
Does it matter?
Does it really matter that MGTOW want to avoid women to any possible extent available? Does it matter that PUA’s study how best to gain the confidence of women in order to bed them and nothing more? Both camps are still adhering to the same core principle at the end of the day which is; not marrying so who cares what approach is employed? Doesn’t anyone recognize that the best way to ‘stick it to the woMAN’ is simply the avoidance of matrimony by men? In TFH’s Misandry Bubble the crux behind the upcoming decline is simply the shortfall of income generated by married men as they simply maintain their families. What so many single men don’t grasp is just how little men really need to survive and just how much even an average single Joe can produce once he get’s hitched and starts having little ones.
I’m sure that there are many readers of the Manosphere who hope to all that is good and holy that TFH is right while they sit in their 2 bedroom condos, or their 1 bedroom/bachelor apartments. Heck, they may be wondering if Feminism will finally crush everything that they hold dear while they peruse the Manosphere on their IPhones in their small rented rooms taking the bus to their decent, but not outstanding, jobs.This is the one thing many single men don’t realize, by refusing to marry and increasing your production, you're hurting Feminism in it’s most vulnerable spot…IT’S WALLET.
The reality is simply this; the equality that women exalt and some men fear is nothing but a fallacy, propped up by an overly large government, which transfers money from family men to women. Due to current laws and policies, it seems that women are equal to men in virtually every single way….but as TFH clearly points out, it only SEEMS that way. If the government loses money and services which women clearly depend on get cut back, or eliminated the fallacy of women’s equality starts to lose serious steam.
A man, who doesn’t marry, is usually a man who doesn’t produce enough to profit the system. Understand, a man who doesn’t marry is Starving the Beast, who really cares what approach is taken? However, I will state one thing about PUA, it is they who are throwing Feminists under the bus.
What need does a man have for a woman besides sex really? Today women look at marriage as a victory for themselves but they don't fathom the reality that marriage doesn’t have the same sort of effect on men. In the past, since men where bigger, stronger, and tougher, the hard and dirty jobs (read; most types of labor) simply where better suited for men. Women didn’t want to engage in many occupations times past and even if they did, they couldn’t hold a candle to their male compatriots. In fact, even some of today’s women are having a hardtime keeping up with men. If a man wanted to get something done, he went to another man. Women held no value in the world of work, but sex is something that men wanted from women, and badly I may add. Women in the past where very adept in seeing the situation for what it was, and protection of their interests was (and still is) their primary concern. They realized that a man could achieve their biological imperative (sex) without committing to a woman’s biological imperative (family and children) so steps had to be taken to ensure they weren’t victimized.
This is where women realized that chastity was leverage they could use against men to gain what they NEEDED from them.
What of the PUA? In reality, the PUA is exactly what feminists don’t want!! In my humble opinion, MGTOW is a tragedy (but sadly a necessity) to men, but PUA are a tragedy to women. Since the abolition of chastity as a Patriarchal form of oppression, women have thrown away their most powerful form of leverage with two hands. Here is the point of this blog post; what does a man lose if his girlfriend (who has been putting out) gives him the, “Marry me or else?” and he turns her down? In the past, she wouldn’t have been putting out, and he would be hard pressed to decline her offer, now however, he loses nothing as many men are realizing the horrors of marriage and realize that their gf’s are relatively easy to replace.
Oops, I guess that part wasn’t disclosed in the Feminist manual?
Heck, a woman can even withdraw sex from her man in a bid for power and since other women still have their open sign lit up, he can leave her and find another, in essence, women have no real leverage to influence a man to commit to her. PUA simply are the embodiment of that new reality in the Sexual Market Place.
Once more, I will state my position on matrimony, that I am a happily married man but I also sadly realize that I’m fast becoming the exception and not the rule. Marriage 2.0 can be very dangerous to men and I simply cannot endorse it currently. Moreover, yes, I happen to have a stepdaughter and I’m anxious about the upcoming tribulation, but I also understand how the evolution of the PUA is simply the male adaptation to feminists tampering of matrimony. At the end of the day; PUA’s, MRA’s, and MGTOW are all on the same team. They all are forgoing marriage and that’s hitting Femmie’s where it hurts.